GovernedAI
The institutional surface for governed AI · sealed receipts only.
Public Ledger

Access Request

No marketing capture. No mailing list. The schema is the form.

Tier 1+ surfaces — architecture summaries, implementation detail, the diligence room, partner-specific evidence — are gated behind counsel-vetted access. The request is plain text. Compose an email with the fields below; we triage by institution and disclosure tier; counsel routes the response.

How to request

Send an email to access@governedai.ai with the following fields. Plain text is preferred. Attachments accepted only if encrypted.

Compose the request

The eight-field schema below is the entire form. We do not parse free-form requests; missing fields delay triage. Counsel routes only complete requests.

Open mail composer with template →

Request schema

Every field is required. The schema is also published as a JSON Schema at /schemas/institutional_access_request.schema.json.

institutional_access_request:
  organization:        # legal entity name and country of incorporation
  role:                # requester's role at the organization
  jurisdiction:        # primary regulatory jurisdiction (e.g. US-SEC, EU-AIAct, UK-FCA)
  use_case:            # what governed-AI artifact is the request scoped to
  requested_tier:      # one of: TIER_1_PARTNER | TIER_2_NDA | TIER_3_INTERNAL_ONLY
  nda_status:          # one of: none | requested | executed | declined
  technical_evaluator: # name and contact of the engineer who will evaluate
  counsel_contact:     # name and contact of retained counsel of record

Field guidance

Field What we mean Why it matters
organization Legal entity name and country of incorporation Counsel-routing depends on jurisdictional fit
role Title and reporting line Disclosure depth scales to seniority and need
jurisdiction Primary regulatory regime relevant to the request EU AI Act, SEC, DORA, NIS2, and state regulators each shape what may be shared
use_case The specific governed-AI artifact you are evaluating We do not accept open-ended discovery requests; the scope is what is shared
requested_tier The disclosure tier you are requesting access to The tier determines counsel review depth and timeline
nda_status Whether an NDA is in place, requested, or pending counsel Tier 1+ surfaces require an executed NDA before any disclosure
technical_evaluator The named engineer or evaluator on your side Diligence rooms are scoped to named evaluators, not organizations
counsel_contact Retained counsel on your side Counsel-to-counsel routing replaces ad-hoc disclosure conversations

What happens next

  1. The request is acknowledged within five business days.
  2. Counsel verifies the eight fields against retained-counsel-only criteria.
  3. If the request is in scope, counsel proposes an NDA shape (mutual NDA, scoped NDA, or partner-tier NDA depending on requested_tier).
  4. Once NDA executes, the diligence room is provisioned for the named technical_evaluator.
  5. Disclosure occurs only inside the diligence room; no Tier 1+ content is shared by email.

Default to non-disclosure. If a request is ambiguous about scope or jurisdiction, the routing default is to ask the requester to clarify, not to disclose conservatively. The discipline favors a smaller, accurate disclosure over a larger, ambiguous one.

No receipt, no governed decision
Tier 0 · RDL-012 · 2026-05-13 No receipt, no governed decision.
Sealed RDL-012 · 2026-05-13